![]() To a sickening degree The politician uttered one platitude after. Special thanks to the contributors of the open-source code that was used in this project: Elastic Search, WordNet, and note that Reverse Dictionary uses third party scripts (such as Google Analytics and advertisements) which use cookies. To infinity the lecture seemed to drone on ad infinitum. The definitions are sourced from the famous and open-source WordNet database, so a huge thanks to the many contributors for creating such an awesome free resource. ![]() In case you didn't notice, you can click on words in the search results and you'll be presented with the definition of that word (if available). For those interested, I also developed Describing Words which helps you find adjectives and interesting descriptors for things (e.g. So this project, Reverse Dictionary, is meant to go hand-in-hand with Related Words to act as a word-finding and brainstorming toolset. That project is closer to a thesaurus in the sense that it returns synonyms for a word (or short phrase) query, but it also returns many broadly related words that aren't included in thesauri. I made this tool after working on Related Words which is a very similar tool, except it uses a bunch of algorithms and multiple databases to find similar words to a search query. So in a sense, this tool is a "search engine for words", or a sentence to word converter. It acts a lot like a thesaurus except that it allows you to search with a definition, rather than a single word. The engine has indexed several million definitions so far, and at this stage it's starting to give consistently good results (though it may return weird results sometimes). For example, if you type something like "longing for a time in the past", then the engine will return "nostalgia". ![]() It simply looks through tonnes of dictionary definitions and grabs the ones that most closely match your search query. It would result in a combinatoric explosion of universes, which only subtly interact with each otherĪnd if that had all happened before to give rise to the Real World, that would be a great way to explain how the Everett many-worlds interpretation came to be valid.The way Reverse Dictionary works is pretty simple. ad valorem Todas las palabras del INGLÉS que empiezan por A Fuente Traducción de ad nauseam del Collins Inglés-Español Read about the team of authors behind Collins Dictionaries. Instead it gives you many, many times the number of universes, which have a limited means of passing information back up the tree and then back down again. ad nauseam Ver uso en: Consulta alfabética ad nauseam ad infinitum ad interim ad lib ad nauseam ad revenue ad val. Since each DEVS machine can contain the entire universe, converting all the matter and energy in the universe into more DEVS machines doesn't just give you a copy of the universe in the virtual. "Habitable" worlds just need matter and energy within a reasonable temperature range - they don't need an atmosphere or water if you are physically a machine in the real world. They could have multiple DEVS systems in the probe so they can try different alternatives simultaneously when thinking of colonizing other worlds. If you connected the people inside the sim to a bunch of robot bodies in the real world, they could pause the simulation on a countdown timer for the long voyage to the stars and then wake up on arrival. The DEVS technology converts all the matter and energy in the observable universe into more DEVS devices by colonizing the stars. It could be millennia of predictive power if you don't give a crap about the predictions being your exact universe or the most likely universe, but you just want tech insights that are valid in your world (the real world).įinally this of course is indistinguishable from strong AI, and it is likely to become a paperclip maximizer. This could be months of valid predictive power if knowledge of the system is kept a secret. Then she builds data centers full of these tiny devices, instantiates them full of copies of the DEVS team and puts them to work solving every technological problem based on newly calibrated models of the real world - giving them post-Lily original sin prescience until the next "real choice" is made. ![]() So what if the Senator, in exchange for keeping the power bill paid for Forrest and Lily's heaven, decides to licence the DEVS technology to make a simulation of the original DEVS research team including Lyndon at his best, and put them to work on making the simulation more efficient, using even less qbits until you hit some lower bound (eg a DEVS that fits in a cellphone sized device in the palm of your hand). In one of the flashbacks, they say "we'd need a qbit for each particle in the universe" and Forrest correctly guesses he can get away with a lot less.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |